Skip to content

psychology

Walter Bockting is a Dutch psychologist who has studied transgender health.

Background

Bockting received his doctoral degree in psychology in 1988 from the Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

From 1988 to 1990, he did a Post-Doctoral Clinical/Research Fellowship in the Program in Human Sexuality at University of Minnesota Medical Schoo’s Department of Family Medicine and Community Health. Hi completed his PhD in 1998.

Bockting was on faculty at the Program in Human Sexuality from 1988 – 2012. During his tenure at PHS, he served as a psychologist, professor, and coordinator of transgender health services. He was also on the graduate faculty of Feminist Studies and a co-founder of the University’s Center for CAH and Disorders of Sex Development.

2006: Fellow, Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality

In 2012 he joined the faculty of Columbia University. His research interests include gender identity development, transgender health, sexuality and the Internet, and HIV prevention, and his work has been supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health, the American Foundation for AIDS Research, and the Minnesota Department of Health.

Publications

Bockting is the author of many scientific articles and editor of five books:

  • Gender Dysphoria: Interdisciplinary Approaches in Clinical Management (Haworth Press, 1992)
  • Transgender and HIV: Risks, Prevention, and Care (Haworth Press, 2001)
  • Masturbation as a Means of Achieving Sexual Health (Haworth Press, 2002)
  • Transgender Health and HIV Prevention (Haworth Press, 2005)
  • Guidelines for Transgender Care (The Haworth Press, 2006)

He served as editor of the International Journal of Transgenderism, and serves on the editorial board of the Journal of Homosexuality. He is past president of the World Professional Organization for Transgender Health, past president and fellow of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality, and vice-president of the North American Federation of Sexuality Organizations.

Bockting is a member of WPATH and works at the Gender Clinic at University of Minnesota. Much of his work is on disease and drug use in the transgender community. Bockting has written a review of Bailey’s book scheduled for publication in the near future. Biological reductionism meets gender diversity in human sexuality.

Media

Walter Bockting | 1 | #ColumbiaPride

References

How Far Has Transgender Health Come Since Stonewall?

Bockting, W. O. (2005). Biological reductionism meets gender diversity in human sexuality. [Review of the book The Man Who Would Be Queen: The Science of Gender-Bending and Transsexualism. J. M. Bailey]. Journal of Sex Research, 42(3), 267-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224490509552281

Resources

Walter Bockting PhD

http://www.nursing.columbia.edu/profile/wbockting

Twitter: @Walter_Bockting

Program for the Study of LGBT Health

http://www.lgbthealthprogram.org/

NIH Office of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion

https://www.edi.nih.gov/people/sep/lgbti/pride-2016/2016-pride-events/speakers/walter-bockting

Gender Identity: 5 Questions with Walter Bockting

https://www.cuimc.columbia.edu/news/gender-identity-5-questions-walter-bockting

UMN

http://myaccount.umn.edu/lookup?UID=bockt001

Eli Coleman (born August 25, 1948) is an American sexologist who has been involved in issues related to transgender health.

Background

Coleman was born in Buffalo, New York and grew up in Montreal, Canada later moving to Chicago, Illinois.

He earned a bachelor’s degree in psychology and history at Marquette University in Milwaukee, Wisconsin and his master’s in psychology at the University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh. He pursued further graduate work at Miami University in Oxford, Ohio, and completed his Ph.D. in counseling psychology at the University of Minnesota in 1978. He became an instructor and then professor in the University’s Program in Human Sexuality in 1978.

He is the founding editor of International Journal of Transgenderism and International Journal of Sexual Health, and he has served in leadership roles for several professional societies, including as President of HBIGDA (now WPATH). Coleman became director of the Program in Human Sexuality in 1991.

Comments on Bailey (2003)

HBIGDA President blasts Bailey book

Urges assembled experts on transgenderism to “challenge bad science”

Release date: September 13, 2003

Ghent, Belgium — The outgoing President of the Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association (HBIGDA) sharply criticized J. Michael Bailey’s recent book as an example of “bad science” about transgenderism.

Dr. Eli Coleman of the University of Minnesota made the remarks during his keynote speech at HBIGDA’s 18th Biennial Symposium in Ghent, Belgium today.

Addressing an audience of the world’s foremost experts on gender identity, Coleman proposed a 10-point blueprint of current and future goals for the organization.

As he outlined the need to “promote sound and ethical research,” Dr. Coleman made a direct reference to The Man Who Would Be Queen by J. Michael Bailey of Northwestern University. The book has been widely denounced as scientifically unsound and deeply biased.

Dr. Coleman urged members to work with the transgender community to “end antipathy and distrust of researchers.” To illustrate what Dr. Coleman called “unfortunate setbacks” to ending this problem, he displayed the Bailey book cover. The book’s provocative title and image of masculine legs and feet in feminine shoes are widely considered to be deliberately insulting. Referring to Bailey’s shoddy scholarship and deeply flawed research methods, Dr. Coleman emphatically declared: “We need to challenge bad science.”

Eli Coleman presentation cites The Man Who Would Be Queen among "unfortunate setbacks"
HBIGDA President’s speech cites the 2003 book ‘The Man Who Would Be Queen’ among “unfortunate setbacks” for trans people.

Jamison Green, a writer and educator recently appointed to the group’s Board of Directors, said of Coleman’s speech: “He was urging HBIGDA as an organization and the membership as a whole (as individuals) to become more assertive in addressing social and political issues that affect transpeople.”

Following the speech, HBIGDA’s incoming President Walter Meyer, M.D. vowed to pursue Dr. Coleman’s 10-point plan:

  1. Promote sexual health including the elimination of barriers to sexual health
  2. Learn from other cultures
  3. Let old paradigms die and new paradigms emerge
  4. Provide access to optimal care
  5. Provide training to allied health professionals
  6. Promote sound and ethical research
  7. End stigma and discrimination
  8. Change laws and social policies
  9. Change religious views
  10. Promote social tolerance for diversity

Dr. Coleman also cited important recent work done by HBIGDA, including expert testimony in a Florida custody case won by a trans father, and the need to fight renewed efforts by the religious groups which still stigmatize transpeople.

In May 2005, Dr. Coleman reiterated his opinion about the Bailey book at the IFGE conference, calling it a “setback.” For more, see Lynn Conway‘s report, linked below.

References

Conway, Lynn (April 30, 2005) Dr. Eli Coleman Rebukes J. Michael Bailey’s Book at IFGE 2005. [link]

Resources

University of Minnesota Medical School (med.umn.edu)

University of Minnesota Libraries (editions.lib.umn.edu)

This section is about academic psychology. There is also a section on academic psychiatry. For transition information please visit therapists specializing in gender topics.

Overview

Many people in our community have been helped by psychologists who worked with them to determine the best course of action for their unique transition needs. Psychology has also been used as a way to control and even harm our community, especially via disease models of gender identity and expression.

At its worst, psychology has been misused in the academic exploitation of our community.

Fields

Psychologists

The following academic psychologists have significant involvement in gender issues.

A

B

C

D

F

K

L

M

P

R

S

V

W

Z

Maxine E. Petersen-Lee is a Canadian psychologist and prominent supporter of disease models of gender identity and expression. Petersen is transgender and is best known for being quoted by J. Michael Bailey in The Man Who Would Be Queen saying, “Most gender patients lie.”

Background

Petersen earned a master’s degree from University of Toronto in 1986 with a thesis titled “Male gender dysphoria and criminality.” Petersen then worked at Toronto’s notorious Clarke Institute, making a gender transition in 1991. Petersen worked closely with Ray Blanchard, Betty Steiner, and Robert Dickey at “Jurassic Clarke,” as the facility was known for its regressive views and policies. Petersen was called an “ace clinician” by Bailey. Petersen and spouse had two children before divorcing. Since starting a new relationship, Petersen sometimes uses the surname Petersen-Lee. Petersen has lived in Innisfil, Ontario and participated in motorsports competitions.

Biographer Zagria Cowan outlined just a few of the ways Petersen was involved in gatekeeping:

In 2000, she and Robert Dickey denied Synthia Kavanagh approval for SRS in that, being in prison, she could not do a Real Life Test. In the same year they were quoted in Vivian Namaste’s book defending the requirement that a trans person should do a year’s Real Life Test before starting hormones, and as critical of activists demanding hormones and surgery as a right. In September 2003 Maxine testified at an Ontario Human Rights Tribunal that government funding should be re-instated for SRS. In November 2003 she resigned from HBIGDA X (Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association, now WPATH) when her boss Ray Blanchard did because it criticized Michael Bailey’s book, The Man Who Would Be Queen, 2003, an act which she described as ‘political correctness’. She now lists her name as Maxine Petersen-Lee and offers private counselling.

Resignation from HBIGDA (2003)

Petersen was part of the committee that revised the HBIGDA Standards of Care in 1998. Petersen resigned from the organization when boss Ray Blanchard did.

From: Maxine Petersen
Sent: 11/5/03 8:10 AM
Subject: Letter of Resignation
November 4, 2003

Walter J. Meyer, III., M.D.
President, Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association
Department of Psychiatry
University of Texas Medical Branch
301 University Blvd.
Galveston, TX 77555-0189
USA

Bean Robinson, Ph.D.
Executive Director, Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association
1300 South 2nd St., #180
Minneapolis, MN 55454
USA

Dear Drs. Meyer and Robinson:

I am writing today regarding the letter sent on behalf of the Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association Board of Directors and Officers in response to a letter from a number of transsexual Internet activists who have taken exception to the work of Professor J. Michael Bailey.

As a transwoman and a member of the committee that was responsible for the 1998 revision of the Standards of Care, I am intensely saddened and shocked that the Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association has taken such an irresponsible action. I have worked for more than twenty-one years for the betterment of hundreds of transsexual patients/clients and have consistently supported healthcare funding for sex reassignment surgery in my home province. I have also published a number of papers on the treatment of transsexual individuals.

As recently as September of 2003 I testified against our government at a Provincial Human Rights Tribunal in support of a number of complainants seeking to have funding for sex reassignment surgery restored to our publicly funded Provincial healthcare plan.

The actions of the Board in this matter have tarnished the reputation of the Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association. By failing to grasp the importance of scientific research to be above the political correctness that is so pervasive in our society, you have perhaps unwittingly but clearly sent a signal to other researchers that they “dare not” explore certain areas of research for fear of the same or similar threat to their career. If there has been any breach of ethical standards, it is up to Northwestern University to investigate these allegations, and that is what they are in the process of doing.

I am certain not one of us wants to see the day when politics trumps scientific inquiry. I have noted recently the considerable justifiable concern expressed by scientists in the U.S. about the Federal Government interfering with or even hinting at withdrawal of funding for research in sexology and the chilling effect this appears to have had on researchers. It is ironic that the Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association seems to have taken a page out of the book of the Bush government and done exactly the same thing.

Regrettably, your actions leave me with no option but to resign my membership in the Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association.

Sincerely,

Maxine Petersen, MA, C. Psych. Assoc.
Coordinator, Gender Identity Clinic
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Lecturer, University of Toronto,
Faculty of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry

References

Zagria (July 4, 2011). Maxine Petersen (195?–) psychologist. A Gender Variance Who’s Who https://zagria.blogspot.com/2011/07/maxine-petersen-195-psychologist.html

Johnson, Micheline (2017). A History of Trans-People. In A History of Trans, a Canadian Perspective. https://web.ncf.ca/fm120/Trans/History/Chapter_2-Trans-People.pdf

Influx (June 2, 2008). CAMH Support Group, Part 2. I’m In Flux. http://iminflux.blogspot.com/2008/06/camh-support-group-part-2.html

Bailey JM (2003). The Man Who Would Be Queen: the science of gender-bending and transsexualism. Joseph Henry Press ISBN 978-0309084185

Namaste VK (2000). Invisible Lives: The Erasure of Transsexual and Transgendered People. University of Chicago Press, 199-201. ISBN 978-0226568102

Selected publications by Petersen-Lee

Petersen M, Stephens J, Dickey R, Lewis W (1996). Transsexuals within the Prison System: An International Survey of Correctional Services Policies. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 14:219–229, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199621)14:2<219::AID-BSL234>3.0.CO;2-N

Levine SB et al. (1999). The Standards of Care for Gender Identity Disorders. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality. Volume 11, 1999 – Issue 2Pages 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v11n02_01

Petersen M (1998). Review: FTM: Female-to-Male Transsexuals in Society by Holly Devor. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality. Toronto Vol. 7, Iss. 2,  (Summer 1998): 166-169. https://www.proquest.com/openview/e3576898de87bae48504f288d189049e/1

Petersen ME, Dickey R (1995).  Surgical sex reassignment: A comparative survey of International centers. Archives of Sexual Behavior, volume 24, pages135–156 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541578

[Publications under the name Leonard H. “Len” Clemmensen]

Stermac L, Blanchard R, Clemmensen LH, Dickey R (1991). Group therapy for gender-dysphoric heterosexual men, Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 17:4, 252-258. https://doi.org/0.1080/00926239108404349

Blanchard R, Steiner BW, Clemmensen LH (1989). Prediction of Regrets in Postoperative Transsexuals. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, February 1, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674378903400111

Blanchard R, Clemmensen LH (1988) A test of the dsm‐III‐R’S implicit assumption that fetishistic arousal and gender dysphoria are mutually exclusive. The Journal of Sex Research, 25:3, 426 432. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498809551472

Blanchard R, Clemmensen LH, Steiner BW (1987). Heterosexual and homosexual gender dysphoria. Archives of Sexual Behavior. volume 16, pages139–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542067

Blanchard R, Clemmensen LH, Steiner BW (1985). Social desirability response set and systematic distortion in the self-report of adult male gender patients. Archives of Sexual Behavior 14, 505–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541751

Blanchard R, Steiner BW, Clemmensen LH (1985). Gender dysphoria, gender reorientation, and the clinical management of transsexualism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53(3), 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.53.3.295

Blanchard R, Clemmensen LH, Steiner BW (1983). Gender reorientation and psychosocial adjustment in male-to-female transsexuals. Archives of Sexual Behavior 12, 503–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542212

Clemmensen LH (1990). The “Real Life Test” for Surgical Candidates, in Blanchard R, Steiner BW (eds). Clinical management of gender identity disorders in children and adults (pp. 121-135). ISBN 978-0880481878

Clemmensen LH (1986). Male gender dysphoria and criminality. University of Toronto, Unpublished master’s thesis, 1986.

Blanchard R, Steiner BW, Clemmensen LH (July 1985). Gender Dysphoria, Gender Reorientation, and the Clinical Management of Transsexualism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53(3):295-304. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.53.3.295

Blanchard R, Clemmensen LH, Steiner BW (1983). Gender reorientation and psychosocial adjustment in male-to-female transsexuals. Archives of Sexual Behavior 1983 Dec;12(6):503-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542212

Resources

Maxine Petersen-Lee, M.A., C. Psych.

Facebook (facebook.com)

Madeline H. “Maddie” Wyndzen (born 1973) is the pen name of an American psychologist who wrote about gender identity and expression from both professional and personal perspectives between 1997 and 2008. Wyndzen wrote a number of important criticisms of disease models of sex and gender minorities.

Background

In 1997, Wyndzen created an early online gender transition resource on GeoCities called Gender Outside the Lines. The site was moved to the Gender Web domain in 1998. In 2001, Wyndzen changed the name to All Mixed Up and moved it to the domain genderpsychology.org. Wyndzen initially used the name Katherine Heather and Katie, switching to “Madeline H. Wyndzen” in 2004 for professional reasons:

I have found in more and more awkward not to have a last name. For example, in order to cite my essays in APA style, you would start with my last name. That is why I created a pen name, “Madeline H. Wyndzen.” Please use this name in all citations, publications, and correspondence with me. I also feel that separating my real name from this web-site can help me step away from transgender issues while I work on other priorities.

Correspondences http://www.genderpsychology.org/identity/mail.html

Comments on Ray Blanchard’s taxonomy

In 2003, Wyndzen published one of the first scientific critiques of the disputed diagnosis “autogynephilia” created in 1989 by Ray Blanchard. Blanchard’s ideas had just been popularized by J. Michael Bailey in the book The Man Who Would Be Queen and on Anne Lawrence’s website. Wyndzen mailed the following notification of the new website material on 13 May 2003:

Scientific critique of autogynephilia & psychopathology model of transsexualism

Hi Everyone,

Ray Blanchard’s Mis-Directed Sex-Drive model of transsexuality, including the controversial notion of autogynephilia, has received a great deal of attention recently. It has had a remarkable amount of success in pervading both general audience and professional medium: Anne Lawrence and J. Michael Bailey each wrote popular accounts, the DSM [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders] and HB-SOC [Harry Benjamin Standards of Care] now include reference to Blanchard’s constructs, and I have heard that even textbooks have started to feature it.

I find this trend disconcerting as both a transsexual and a scientific psychologist. I feel the evidence for this theory is weak. Interpreting this theory to say that MtF [male-to-female] transsexuals are ‘really’ gay men or ‘really’ crossdressing men is insensitive. Many perspectives on this controversy have been expressed. Typically the scientific perspective has been held by those most supportive of Blanchard’s model. I would like to advance a scientific perspective that is skeptical of Blanchard’s model and the ability of any Psycho-pathological model to adequately understand transgenderism. Some of you may be interested in the following two new essays found on my web-site (links are below).

The Banality of Insensitivity: Portrayals of Transgenderism in Psychopathology

Though the mental health community intends to help transsexuals, embedded within psychopathology is an insensitivity towards the very people it seeks to help. Removal of the mental illness diagnostic categories “Gender Identity Disorder” and “Transvestic Fetishism” is recommended to allow for objective scientific work and to heal the divisive relationships between the mental health and transgender communities. Included in this essay is a discussion of the idea that we are ‘really’ our biological sex according to Blanchard’s model. Also included is a discussion of the claim that transsexuals who deny a sexual motivation for their gender dysphoria are lying.

WEB LINK: http://www.genderpsychology.org/psychology/mental_illness_model.html

“Blanchard’s Mis-Directed Sex-Drive Model of Transsexuality”

This essay provides a scientific critique of Blanchard’s model. It includes a summary of the model’s key points and the evidence supporting those points. It continues to address what may be numerous serious methodological flaws. The essay also addresses the clinical intuition that sexuality may be the only force powerful enough to explain transsexuality by showing how the psychological literature suggests identity is also a remarkably powerful mechanism.

WEB LINK: http://www.genderpsychology.org/psychology/blanchard/

Any feedback about these essays is always appreciated. I would very much appreciate if you would please forward this message to other transgender mailing lists where Blanchard’s model has been a significant or recent topic.

Best wishes,
[Madeline – signed “Katie” in the original]

American Psychological Association Division 44

In 2004, Wyndzen published an essay in response to a favorable book review written by Bailey friend James Cantor that appeared in the newsletter for Division 44 of the American Psychological Association.

A Personal & Scientific look at a Mental Illness Model of Transgenderism

http://www.apa.org/divisions/div44/2004Spring.pdf [archive]

Madeline H. Wyndzen, Ph. D. (pen name)

Editor’s Note: Ms. Wyndzen originally submitted a brief letter to the editor in response to a recent book review of The Man Who Would Be Queen in this Newsletter. I invited her to expand on that letter here.

If a man sought therapy due to unhappiness over his attraction to other men, a therapist would likely diagnose him with Depression. If a transsexual sought therapy due to unhappiness over his or her biological sex, a therapist would almost certainly diagnose him or her with Gender Identity Disorder. Whereas gay men and lesbian women are diagnosed for how they suffer, transsexuals are diagnosed for who they are. As a psychologist and transsexual, I find that the mental illness label imposed on transsexuality is just as disquieting as the label that used to be imposed on homosexuality.

Similar to antiquated ideas suggesting that homosexuality is a deviant sex-drive, Ray Blanchard (1989, 1991) proposed that transsexuality is a mis-directed form of either heterosexuality (named “autogynephilia”) or homosexuality. Rather than asking the scientifically neutral question, “What is transgenderism?” Blanchard (1991) asks, “What kind of defect in a male’s capacity for sexual learning could produce 
 autogynephilia, transvestitism 
?” (p. 246).

Blanchard’s model is featured prominently and uncritically in J. Michael Bailey’s (2003a) recent book, The Man who would be Queen: the Science of Gender-Bending and Transsexualism. A balanced portrait of Blanchard’s key empirical findings (1989) would reveal that they: (1) have never been replicated, (2) failed to include control groups of typically-gendered women, (3) failed to covary the acknowledged age-differences from ANOVA, and (4) drew conclusions about causality from entirely observational data.

Inconsistencies between transsexuals’ self-portraits and Blanchard’s model are reconciled by Bailey (2003a) with the suggestion that some transsexuals are deceptive: “There is one more reason why many autogynephiles provide misleading information about themselves that is different than outright lying. It has to do with obsession” (p. 175). Aware of concerns that some may be troubled by his portrayal of them, Bailey has said, “I cannot be a slave to sensitivity” (quoted in Wilson, 2003), and “ There is good scientific evidence that says you should believe me and not them” (quoted in Dreier & Anderson, 2003). In a critique of Bailey’s book available on my website, I provide alternate interpretations of this evidence: http://www.genderpsychology.org/autogynephilia/

Bailey (2003b) contends that negative reactions to his book are merely “identity politics” that are a “hindrance” to “scientific truth” (Bailey, 2003b). Contrasting his objectivity with others’ politics reminded me of “81 Words,” a radio documentary about the removal of homosexuality from the DSM (Spiegel, 2002). Those who diagnosed ‘homosexuality’ as a mental illness genuinely felt that they were helping their clients. I know that Ray Blanchard, J. Michael Bailey, and others are similarly concerned about the welfare of transsexuals. I only wish they would see the bias in their theories and diagnoses. When I listened to “81 Words,” I was struck by how foreign it sounded to talk about being gay or lesbian as a disorder. I am too young to remember that time. My hope is that someday my children will think it just as unfathomable that I was once diagnosed and treated for “Gender Identity Disorder.”

References

Bailey, J. M. (2003a). The Man who would be queen: the science of genderbending and transsexualism. Joseph Henry Press, Washington DC.

Bailey, J. M. (2003b, July 19). Identity politics as a hindrance to scientific truth, presented at the conference of the International Academy of Sex Research. Abstract retrieved July 16, 2003, from http://www.iasr.org/meeting/2003/ABSTRACTS2003.doc

Blanchard, R. (1989). The Concept of Autogynephilia and the Typology of Male Gender Dysphoria. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 177(10), 616-623.

Blanchard, R. (1991). Clinical Observations and systematic studies of autogynephilia. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 17(4), 235-251.

Dreier, S. and Anderson, K. (2003, April 21). Prof’s book challenges opinions of human sexuality. The Daily Northwestern, retrieved December 31, 2003, from http://www.dailynorthwestern.com/

Spiegel, A. (2002, January 18). 81 words. This American Life, retrieved January 18, 2002 from http://www.thislife.org/pages/descriptions/02/204.html

Wilson, R. (2003, June 20). Dr. Sex’: A human-sexuality expert creates controversy with a new book on gay men and transsexuals. Chronicle of Higher Education, retrieved June 27, 2003, from http://chronicle.com/free/v49/i41/41a00801.htm

Comments on J. Michael Bailey’s book

In 2005, Wyndzen expanded earlier online materials to summarize the controversy and criticisms of Bailey from professional and personal perspectives.

The World according to J. Michael Bailey inside “The Man who would be Queen: The Science of Gender Bending and Transsexualism”

J. Michael Bailey’s book, “The Man who would be Queen: The Science of Gender Bending and Transsexualism” has disrupted the lives of transgendered persons and the lives of mental health professionals who work with them. Some psychologists question the truthfulness of their transgendered clients. Some transgendered persons question if the therapists conceal a dismissive cynicism underneath an exterior of unconditional acceptance. It has become acceptable for transgendered persons to dismiss each others feelings as deception. And it has become acceptable for psychological researchers to regard the feelings of transsexuals as merely politics getting in the way of important work.

As a psychological scientist and a transsexual I find myself both deeply affected by this controversy and in a unique position to interpret it. The following essays are my attempt to make sense of Bailey’s book and the controversy surrounding it.

http://www.genderpsychology.org/autogynephilia/j_michael_bailey/

Comments on DSM

Wyndzen has written about how gender identity and expression are covered in the 4th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV):

In 1994, the DSM-IV committee replaced the diagnosis of Transsexualism with Gender Identity Disorder. Depending on their age, those with a strong and persistent cross-gender identification and a persistent discomfort with his or her sex or a sense of inappropriateness in the gender role of that sex were to be diagnosed as Gender Identity Disorder of Childhood (302.6), Adolescence, or Adulthood (302.85). For persons who did not meet the criteria, Gender Identity Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (GIDNOS)(302.6) was to be used. 

DSM IV http://www.genderpsychology.org/transsexual/dsm_iv.html

That version also listed “Transvestic Fetishism” (302.3) under paraphilias.

Comment on Alice Dreger’s target article

In 2008, Wyndzen published a peer commentary responding to a target article by historian Alice Dreger. The article was published by Kenneth Zucker in Archives of Sexual Behavior, a sexology journal where Bailey served on the editorial board. Zucker had been praised throughout Bailey’s book, so many Zucker critics saw this as a conflict of interest. Dreger had also given a draft to anti-trans activist Benedict Carey at the New York Times a year before publication. Carey had given favorable coverage to Bailey before with his 2005 piece “Gay, Straight, or Lying: Bisexuality Revisited.” That piece uncritically repeated Bailey’s claims that male bisexuality does not exist. Carey’s 2007 favorable coverage of Dreger painted Bailey as a “scientist under siege.” In 2008, Wyndzen’s commentary was published with a number of others:

A social psychology of a history of a snippet in the psychology of transgenderism.

Alice Dreger wrote an oral history for the Archives of Sexual Behavior, “The Controversy Surrounding ‘The Man Who Would Be Queen: A Case History of the Politics of Science, Identity, and Sex in the Internet Age. Though Dreger suggests disagreeing with autogynephila is the focal point of the backlash against J. Michael Bailey, I suggest from the historical pattern that Bailey experienced a backlash because he accused those who disagree with him of lying. Merely acknowledging autogynephilia or opposing a “feminine essence model” provoked little controversy. I explain Dreger’s misconstrued historical account and Bailey, Anne Lawrence, and Ray Blanchard’s over-simplified psychological accounts with common biases described by social psychology: fundamental attribution error, group polarization, groupthink, stereotyping, representativeness heuristic, base-rate neglect, framing effects, and the correspondence bias. Journal editor Kenneth Zucker offered the opportunity to write responses. Though we have very different perspectives on autogynephilia and the way transgendered persons are understood by psychology, he graciously agreed to include my response.

http://www.genderpsychology.org/autogynephilia/alice_dreger.html

Wikipedia controversy

In 2008, Canadian anti-trans extremist James Cantor began editing Wikipedia under the pseudonyms MarionTheLibrarian and WriteMakesRight. Cantor quickly began self-promoting and removing criticisms. It soon became clear that Cantor was behind the accounts, and Cantor was ultimately banned from Wikipedia.

Among Cantor’s early edits were attempts to remove all references to Wyndzen’s work from Wikipedia.

I told Wyndzen about Cantor’s activities, and Wyndzen wrote the letter below to Wikipedia editors on July 31, 2008 in hopes of having Cantor’s suppression reverted. Despite a year of effort by Wyndzen, Cantor prevailed in keeping Wyndzen from being cited on Wikipedia. This controversy marked the end of Wyndzen’s public writings about gender.

Dear Andrea James,

Thank you for letting me know about James Cantor’s effort to remove reference to my work from Wikipedia.  Though disappointing, it is also flattering that he considers this worth his time.  Perhaps he recognizes the accuracy of my critique of autogynephilia and he worries that when other behavioral scientists read it (especially those not already committed to a side), they will recognize how weak Ray Blanchard’s model is.  James Cantor and his colleagues may also be starting to recognize the larger problem of beginning their account with the assumption of a mental illness model and how it results in stereotypes of transgender persons.  They may be worried about the ongoing debate about including transgendered persons in the DSM for being who they are; censoring Wikipedia so it only showcases their side as reliable might delay uncommitted psychiatrists and psychologists from readily finding the scientific accounts on the other side.  It’s a clever manipulation of our scientific heuristic that peer-reviewed journals contain more credible information.  Like all heuristics that usually work, it sometimes fails.  It fails in this case because the journals are part of a mental health community that begins with the assumption that we are mentally ill for being who we are.  Those who begin from a neutral or positive perspective on transgenderism lack journals of their own.

Imagine what James Cantor’s life as a gay man would be like today if those at the American Psychiatric Association dismissed Dr. Anonymous as “unreliable” because he did not publish against the mental illness model of homosexuality in a peer-reviewed journal or because he protected his identity.  As psychology professors, James Cantor and I both know that it’s the quality of our arguments that matter – not our names, credentials, or the sources in which we publish.  Perhaps the transgender community should gently remind him that you cannot raise yourself up by pushing others down.  Even if he continues to behave unscientifically, I am not sure why this persuades other Wikipedia editors?  I thought the spirit of Wikipedia was to be neutral, present all sides, and let readers judge for themselves?  It’s a spirit I agree with.  When Anne Lawrence introduced autogynephilia to the transgender community, I discussed with Ray Blanchard exposing a wider audience to his original work and he graciously allowed me to post some of his writing on my website.  Maybe James Cantor feels better believing I am unreliable.  Maybe others will feel that I am credible because of my decade of involvement in the trans-community and my numerous efforts to bridge the divide between transgender and psychological communities.  If it may help, please feel free to post this message.  I hope you are successful in preserving Wikipedia’s principled neutral stance.

Best wishes,
Madeline Wyndzen
http://www.GenderPsychology.org/

References

Wyndzen MH (2004). A Personal and Scientific Look at a Mental Illness Model of Transgenderism,” American Psychological Association Division 44 Newsletter (Spring 2004). http://www.genderpsychology.0rg/autogynephilia/apa_div_44.html [PDF]

Wyndzen MH (2008). A social psychology of a history of a snippet in the psychology of transgenderism. Arch Sex Behav. 2008 Jun;37(3):498-502; discussion 505-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9340-2. [link]

Resources

All Mixed Up (genderpsychology.org)

Gender Web (genderweb.org)

  • http://www.genderweb.org/~katherine/ [archive]

Lynne Carroll is an American psychologist and author of numerous articles and book chapters on sex and gender minority issues.

Background

Carroll was born circa 1957. Carroll obtained a master’s and a doctoral degree in psychology from the University of Pittsburgh. Carroll is board certified by The American Board of Professional Psychology in Counseling Psychology.

While serving as a professor of psychology, Carroll authored a textbook, professional articles, book chapters, and papers and posters on diverse topics at national and international professional conferences.

Carroll has practiced as a psychologist in Florida and Maryland and as a counselor in community agencies and university settings in Pennsylvania and elsewhere.

Carroll taught at the University of North Florida and at University of South Florida.

PY8827 Florida board certified diplomate in Counseling Psychology by the American Board of Professional Psychology Graduated 1985

Resources

LinkedIn (linkedin.com)

Comprehensive MedPsych Systems (medpsych.net)

  • Lynne Carroll [archive]
  • https://www.medpsych.net/staff/carroll-lynne-ph-d-abpp/

Therapist Healthcare (therapist.healthcare)

  • Lynne Carroll
  • https://therapist.healthcare/directory/listing/1932-lynne-carroll

Florida Counseling and Evaluation Services (flces.com)

  • Lynne Carroll [archive]
  • http://www.flces.com/OurClinicians.en.html

NPI 1578999249

Notes

Counseling transgender, Transsexual, and Gender-Variant Clients

By Lynne Carroll, Paula J. Gilroy, and Jo Ryan

Source: Journal of Counseling & Development; Spring 2002, Vol. 80 Issue 2, p131, 9p

A journal of the American Counseling Association

Republished at transgendermap.com with kind permission of the authors and publisher.


The emergent consciousness and political activism within the transgender community has important implications for the field of counseling. In the current paradigm, the focus has shifted from using surgical and hormonal interventions and thereby enabling transgender persons to “pass” within the traditional gender binary of society to affirming the unique identities of transgender persons. To prepare counselors, counselor educators, and counseling supervisors for this important challenge, the authors describe the evolving nature of the transgender community, discuss mental health issues and counseling interventions for use with transgender clients, and present a case study detailing the progression of counseling with 1 transgender client.

Despite the recent focus on multiculturalism and diversity within the counseling field, the transgender population has been given insufficient attention in research and in counselor training. Although gay, lesbian, and bisexual issues are beginning to receive much needed attention in multicultural texts and professional journals (e.g., the 1998 special issue in The Counseling Psychologist, the recent publication by the American Psychological Association titled Handbook of Counseling and Psychotherapy With Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Clients, by Perez, DeBord, & Bieschke, 2000), discussion of transgender issues is rare in such publications. For the most part, mental health practitioners’ views about transsexuals, transvestites or cross-dressers, and others with transgender status have “not been informed by objective empirical research” (Fox, 1996, p. 31). Consequently, counselors are ill- prepared to meet the needs of such clients. The purpose of this article is to inform counselor educators, counselors, and supervisors about the salient clinical issues that arise when working with transgender clients. Specifically, the following areas are addressed: (a) the emerging and evolving definition of the transgender community, (b) the politicization of the transgender movement, (c) clinical issues and interventions for use with transgender clients, and (d) the presentation of an actual case that details the progression of personal therapy with a transgender client.

EVOLVING DEFINITIONS

The term transgender was coined in the late 1980s by men who did not find the label transvestite adequate enough to describe their desire to live as women (Prosser, 1997). Alternately, the term transsexual was deemed inappropriate because many nontraditionally gender-identified persons did not necessarily want to reconfigure their bodies surgically and hormonally and did not share the desire to “pass,” or to fit into normative gender categories of male and female. Included in the full spectrum of people with nontraditional gender identities are pre- and postoperative transsexuals, cross-dressers or transvestites, intersex persons, and those who are disinterested in passing. Among the many terms used interchangeably to describe this community are transgender persons, gender-variant persons, and trans persons. For consistency in this article, we use transgender persons and its variations.

Today, the continued proliferation of identifying terms within the transgender community, including gender-bender, gender outlaws, gender trash, gender queer, transsexual lesbian, and so forth, reflects the diversity within this community as well as the ongoing struggle for self-definition. Novelist Leslie Feinberg (1998), who is transgender and an activist for this community, observed that “our lives are proof that sex and gender are much more complex than a delivery room doctor’s glance at genitals can determine, more variegated than pink or blue birth caps” (p. 5).

For many counselors, these variations in terms and identifications within the transgender community are confusing. We have found Eyler and Wright’s (1997) “nine-point gender continuum” (p. 6) to be a helpful framework for us to organize our understanding of the multiplicity of gender identifications that exist. Eyler and Wright’s continuum depicts possible gender identities ranging from “female-based” identities to “male-based” identities, with “bigendered” identities (defined as alternating between feeling/behaving like a woman and feeling/behaving like a man) in the center.

Attempts to estimate the prevalence of transgender persons have been problematic because such efforts have been based on counting persons who request surgical reassignment of their sex and who therefore would very likely be considered transsexuals (Ettner, 1999). Ettner (1999) maintained that the prevalence of persons with “gender dysphoria,” defined as psychological discomfort with one’s biological sex, is “grossly underreported” (p. 28). She indicated that estimates vary from a range of 3% to 5% to a range of 8% to 10% of the general population. Whatever the figures, it is likely that mental health care providers will encounter at least one transgender client at some point in their professional career (Ettner, 1999).

THE BIRTH OF THE TRANSGENDER MOVEMENT

As Parlee (1998) and Denny (1992) noted, the emerging political activism and organization of the transgender community is both the cause and the consequence of several recent sociocultural events including (a) the closing of university-affiliated gender clinics and subsequent opening of private clinics(Reader’s note. According to Cole, Denny, Eyler, & Samons, 2000, the disaffiliation of universities from their respective gender clinics was in large part precipitated by the release of a scientific publication by J. K. Meyer & Reter, 1979, which reported no improvement in the lives of patients after sex reassignment. The report was later discredited.); (b) the organization of the 1992 International Conference on Transgender Law and Employment Policy to fight for the legal and social rights of transgenderists; (c) the First International Conference on Gender, Cross-Dressing and Sex Issues in 1995; (d) the demonstration on behalf of the rights of infants born with ambiguous genitalia, who routinely undergo corrective pediatric surgery, by the Intersex Society of North America (ISNA), at the 1996 meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics in Boston; (e) the publication by ISNA of the newsletter titled Hermaphrodites With Attitude; (f) the formation of TOPS (transgender Officers Protect and Serve for transgender police, firefighters, military, etc.); and (g) the formation of Gender PAC (political action committee), the first transgender political education fund. Several authors (e.g., Denny, 1997; Gagne, Tewksbury, & McGaughey, 1997; Whittle, 1998) also attributed much of recent transgender activism to the increasing use of cyberspace. The plethora of Web sites and chat rooms has provided possibilities for transgender persons to communicate and support one another with anonymity. The media attention given to this issue and the visibility of transgender persons in movies and popular culture (drag queen RuPaul and the Lady Chablis, star of the film Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil, Eastwood, 1997) have enabled activists to challenge public intolerance and grow in self-confidence and affirmation.

Perhaps more than any of the aformentioned events, the publicity surrounding the hate crimes perpetrated against transgender persons has stimulated, mobilized, and activated the transgender community. Indeed, most, if not all, transgender persons know only too well the consequences of straying from compliance with the definition and appearance of what is considered “normal” gender expression. Gagne and Tewksbury (1998) observed that transgender persons who are neither masculine nor feminine must deal with “the ubiquity of the binary system’s dictate that all social actors ‘do gender and do it right’” (p. 100). Such persons are truly on the margin of society and are at most risk for social ostracism and discrimination. As Bornstein (1994) noted,

There is most certainly a privilege to having a gender. Just ask someone who doesn’t have a gender, or who can’t pass, or who doesn’t pass. When you have a gender, or when you are perceived as having a gender, you don’t get laughed at in the street. You don’t get beat up. You know which public bathroom to use, and when you use it, people don’t stare at you or worse. You know which form to fill out. You know what clothes to wear. You have heroes and role models. You have a past. (p. 127)

In 1993, the death of Brandon Teena, a female-to-male (FTM) transgender person, captured the headlines and was the focus of a popular film titled Boys Don’t Cry (Peirce, 1999). Brandon was brutally raped and murdered after two male acquaintances discovered that he was biologically female. The death of the transgender woman Tyra Hunter, who was left unattended by paramedics at the scene of a car accident after they opened her pants and discovered that she had a penis (Stine, as reported by Parlee, 1998), horrified and outraged many in the transgender community. Leslie Feinberg (1998), a lesbian, described being near death and refused treatment by a physician in the emergency room of a hospital because of “hir” (pronounced like “here”) gender expression. (Feinberg expressed a preference for the term “hir” because it blends the pronouns him and her.)

As a result of such sociocultural phenomena, many in the transgender community have rejected the use of such clinical terms as gender dysphoria. The use of diagnostic terms contained in the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association, 1994), such as transvestic fetish and gender identity disorder, were also rejected because they seem to pathologize and dehumanize persons with nontraditional gender identities. The medical and psychiatric communities are viewed with suspicion by many in the transgender community because they have historically served as regulators and gatekeepers in the gender transition process. Beginning in 1979, persons seeking hormonal therapy or sex reassignment, or both, were required to seek counseling and adhere to a series of procedures defined in “the standards of care,” developed by the Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association (W. Meyer et al., 2001). These standards dictated that hormonal and surgical candidates receive counseling and obtain official letters of recommendation by qualified mental health professionals. Those interested in surgical reassignment were also mandated to live as their desired gender for approximately 1 year (called “the real life experience”) prior to surgery. Many now seek to “define themselves rather than asking or allowing themselves to be defined by helping professionals,” and thereby “do as little or as much as they wish to their bodies” (Denny, 1997, p. 37). For example in 1993, at the Conference on Transgender Law and Employment Policy, the International Bill of Gender Rights had specifically included the right to “freedom from psychiatric diagnosis and treatment” and thereby reflected the desire by many not to have to conform to a prescribed regimen dictated by the medical and psychiatric establishments (i.e., Standards of Care of the Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association; W. Meyer et al., 2001).

THE CRITIQUE OF PASSING

Although many transsexuals are able, with the aid of hormonal and surgical interventions, to successfully pass as their desired gender without detection, it is important to note that others are less successful in doing so. Either the medical procedures are too costly and painful or their basic body morphology makes their attempt to transition more noticeable to others. It is partly for this reason that many transgender activists (e.g., Feinberg, 1998; Stone, 1991) have advocated that transsexual persons “come out” and identify themselves as transgender and, in so doing, “begin to write oneself into the discourses which have been written [about us]” (Stone, 1991, p. 299). On the basis of his extensive interviews with persons with nontraditional gender identities, Hill (1997) noted that the majority preferred to identify themselves as “transgender” and did not want to “reedit” their biographies or to “pass” in mainstream society. As Feinberg (1998) stated, “We are oppressed for not fitting these narrow social norms, and we are fighting back” (p. 5). Bockting (1997) observed that by affirming their identities as either transsexuals or transgender persons, persons with nontraditional gender identities can alleviate the shame, isolation, and secrecy that often accompany attempts to pass as a desired gender.

IMPLICATIONS FOR COUNSELING

The emergent transgender consciousness and political activism emanating from this community have important implications for the field of counseling. Treatment issues no longer center on assisting “gender dysphoric” persons in their adjustment to their new gender but include the possibility of affirming a unique transgender identity (Bockting, 1997). In this paradigm shift, the focus is not on transforming transgender clients but rather transforming the cultural context in which they live. To assist counselors, counselor educators, and supervisors with this challenge, we adapt the multicultural counseling competencies described in Sue, Arredondo, and McDavis (1992), Sue et al. (1982), and Sue and Sue (1999) to address the crucial counselor attitudes, knowledge, and skills that are needed for work with transgender persons.

Counselor Attitudes

We believe that clinicians need to rethink their assumptions about gender, sexuality, and sexual orientation and to adopt a “trans-positive” or “trans-affirmative” disposition to counseling. A trans-affirmative approach necessitates that counselors affirm transgender persons; advocate for political, social, and economic rights for the transgender; and educate others about such issues. Such an approach is similar to the practice of “sex-positive” therapy (Queen, 1996) and gay-affirmative therapy with gay men, lesbians, and bisexual persons and requires that, first and foremost, counselors, supervisors, and researchers should recognize that they may not only have a role in alleviating the emotional distress of clients who challenge the binary gender system but may also be responsible for contributing to or exacerbating it. Counselors must be sensitive to the fact that the medical and psychiatric establishments have long histories of pathologizing transgender persons. Ettner (1999), for example, has observed that counselors have communicated reductionist either-or messages, such as counseling clients out of sex reassignment procedures because of “somatically inappropriate” body types, facial features, and so forth. In their qualitative study of MTF transsexuals, Gagne et al. (1997) found that the majority reported having been actively involved in psychotherapy and indicated that they were pressured by their therapists to come out to others and appear as women. In these cases, therapists may fail to take into account the possible repercussions, such as violence and harassment, that may ensue if clients are not adequately psychologically, financially, and emotionally prepared for such a rapid transition. There are still incidents of counselors who adamantly believe that transsexual people are “fundamentally homophilic but cannot consciously accept their sexual orientation” (Fagan, Schmidt, & Wise, 1994). In contrast to the common stereotypical assumption that transgender persons are gay or lesbian, the clinical literature has within the last several years reflected the reality that many transsexuals are bisexual (Bolin, 1988; Denny & Green, 1996). Denny and Green, for example, observed that many postoperative transsexuals (persons who have completed the surgical reassignment process) find bisexual partners attractive because they are not exclusively focused on gender as a determinant of sexual and emotional attraction.

Counselor Knowledge and Skills

To help counselors build an adequate knowledge base for understanding transgender issues in counseling, they must have information regarding the political, historical, and psychological contexts in which transgender clients live. Counselors need to become familiar with the evolving terminology and politics of the transgender movement. Because the growth of transgender studies was partly facilitated by the use of autobiographies of transgender persons (Parlee, 1998), training efforts should incorporate such narratives. We recommend that counseling professionals read such biographical texts as Stone Butch Blues (Feinberg, 1993) and Gender Outlaw: On Men, Women, and the Rest of Us (Bornstein, 1994) and general texts, such as Transgender Warriors: Making History From Joan of Arc to RuPaul (Feinberg, 1996), Confessions of a Gender Defender: A Psychologist’s Reflections on Life Among the transgender (Ettner, 1996), and My Gender Workbook (Bornstein, 1998). Such films as Paris Is Burning (Livingston, 1991), Ma Vie En Rose (Berliner, 1997), The Brandon Teena Story (Muska & Olafsdottir, 1998), Boys Don’t Cry (Peirce, 1999), Outlaw (Lebow, 1994), and periodicals such as Gendertrash, Transgender Tapestry, and Chrysalis Quarterly are also helpful in exploring the culture of transgender people. As Parlee (1998) pointed out, the opportunities created by academics “working outside positivist research traditions, using methods that allow transgender persons to speak for and about themselves to researchers they trust” (p. 131) has permitted a more complex level of theorizing about gender than ever before.

We advocate that counselors familiarize themselves with the burgeoning of postmodern analyses across many academic disciplines including sociology, literature, and philosophy. The postmodern deconstructionist movement critiqued the belief in “universal troths” and acknowledged that some identities are socially constructed with the purpose of privileging some categories and not others (Layton, 1998). Those analyses and the subsequent emergence of Queer and Transgender studies opened up new possibilities for academic counseling to challenge traditional binary notions of sex/gender. Adhering to the work of Foucault (1980), “queer” theorists believe that discourse, which refers to the use of language as a form of social practice, typically places people in different power positions. Foucault insisted that the discourse of sexuality, the discourse that defines “the homosexual” as a separate species, is a discourse of power. Perhaps one of the most influential contemporary theoreticians is Judith Butler (1990) whose text, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, argued against the view of gender as a biological given. She contended that feminine or masculine behaviors are performative and are the by- product of cultural norms.

It is essential that counselors working with the transgender population have adequate knowledge of local, regional, and national support networks for the transgender community. The significance of collective organizing to enhance self-esteem in this population has been documented (Lombardi, 1999; Mason-Schrock, 1996). In Mason-Schrock’s qualitative study of support group interaction, he viewed this community as performing an integral function in preoperative transsexuals’ narrative construction of the “true self.” Lombardi reported that the greater the social network, the greater the opportunities for members to talk about gender issues with one another. As Parlee (1998) pointed out, the growing sense of community serves to challenge the pathologizing medical community and the violence and discrimination that have arisen both in the past and the present.

It must also be noted that despite the trend in transgender communities to build coalitions between subgroups like cross-dressers, intersexed, MTF transsexuals, FTM transsexuals, and so forth, tension and differences within the transgender community sometimes interfere in this process. Many authors (e.g., Bornstein, 1998) have commented on the sometimes uneasy alliance between the gay and lesbian community and the transgender community. Lorber (1998) observed, “despite attempts of queer theorists to include lesbians, gays, bisexuals, transgenders, and hermaphrodites under one transgressive category, they themselves have broken up into multiple groups with different political goals” (p. 436). Halberstam (1998) noted, for example, the tension between FTM transsexuals and lesbian feminists. It is important that clinicians not assume that all transgender persons have the same consciousness about gender identities. For example, in Gagne and Tewksbury’s (1998) study of transgenderists (the majority of their volunteer sample consisted of preoperative MTF transsexuals and cross-dressers), most desired to refigure their bodies in such a way as to pass as women. Only a minority of those in their sample expressed a desire to live as transgenderists and to break out of the traditional gender binary.

Bockting (1997) advocated that counselors assume a client-centered approach. Given the societal discrimination that transgender persons must continually confront, the issue of trust is paramount when working with such clients. For this reason, constructivist therapy approaches are particularly helpful in working with transgender clients. Laird (1999) advocated that practitioners assume a narrative stance in which clients fully tell their own stories unburdened by the prior assumptions of the therapist about gender and sexuality. Basically, counselors need to create an atmosphere in which the larger cultural narratives concerning heterosexism and gender are deconstructed. Laird recommended adopting an “informed not knowing” stance (Shapiro, 1996) in which the counselor leaves “behind her own cultural biases and pre- understandings, to enter the experience of the other” (Laird, 1999, p. 75). Laird also advocated that therapists bring the stories of their clients to the professional literature and into the political arena.

We recommend that counselors working with transgender clients strike a balance between facilitating client self-discourse and incorporating more directive interventions. Ettner (1999) advocated that mental health professionals who work with the transgender population possess what she called “cognitive flexibility” and that they adapt a more directive, holistic style to therapy. Effective counseling with this population also requires not only that counselors possess effective clinical skills but also that they be adept at consultation, referral, and case management. Frequently, the counselor’s role is one of clarifier, aiding clients in distinguishing between sexual fantasies, sexual attractions, and gender identity (Denny & Green, 1996) and in recognizing the full spectrum of gender identities and options that such persons have in terms of partial or complete change in primary or secondary sex characteristics (Bockting, 1997). Counselors may need to explore with their transgender clients the “merits of various physical changes in the context of the individuals’ identity development with an emphasis on personal comfort and well-being” (Bockting, 1997, p. 51).

Clinical Issues

transgender persons seek counseling for a variety of presenting issues including depression, alcoholism and other substance abuse, fetishism, inability to perform at school or work, and physical abuse from parents or peers (Denny & Green, 1996). Because of the intense discrimination that transgender persons experience, feelings of low self-esteem and depression may be especially intense. As previously noted, counselors have historically assumed gatekeeping functions regarding the gender identity process. As a result of negative reaction to this role, there is the possibility that transgender persons may be less than forthcoming with counselors about the severity of their depression. Counselors need to consider the possibility that such symptoms constitute ways of coping and may be the by-products of the discrimination and prejudice that transgender persons experience in today’s culture. Another important issue that is particularly germane to the transgender population concerns the lack of knowledge about HIV risk and safe sex (Bockting, Robinson, & Rosser, 1998). Previous studies have indicated that HIV/AIDS has already significantly affected transgender persons. Bockting et al. (1998) observed that many transgender persons do not identify themselves as persons who engage in high-risk sexual behaviors. Attention must also be paid to issues of relationship violence and personal safety. As Bockting et al. noted in their focus groups with transgenderists, MTF transsexuals are especially vulnerable to sexual assault because of their lack of experience with sexual advances by biological males. The interested reader should consult the following texts for further information concerning counseling issues and interventions with transgender clients: Gender Blending (Bullough, Bullough, & Elias, 1997); Gender Loving Care: A Guide to Counseling Gender-Variant Clients (Ettner, 1999); Counseling in Genderland: A Guide for You and Your transgender Client (Miller, 1996); and the book chapter titled “Issues of Transgender” by Cole et al. (2000).

CASE STUDY: T IS FOR TERRY AND FOR transgender

Because narratives of transgender persons have played such an integral role in the growth of the transgender rights movement, we chronicle the experiences of Terry (fictitious name), a transgender client who presented for therapy with the second author. Terry first came to the counseling center in 1998 for an intake interview. Terry was born a biological male in the northeastern United States and was named by her parents after a popular professional athlete. This decision by her parents points out how even at birth, they had definitive expectations of their “son,” expectations which included that “he” excel at sports and be drawn to stereotypically “masculine” pursuits. Once she entered elementary school, Terry immediately became aware of her gender difference. She quickly discovered how she differed from her peers by the assaults on her nontraditional gender identity. On a regular basis, she faced taunts, ridicule, and isolation from her peers. Terry became aware that the social penalties imposed against feminine boys (boys who exhibited gender-atypical qualifies) were rigidly enforced. Taunts on the playground escalated into more severe persecution in junior high school when Terry was frequently called “faggot” and “queer.” At this point in time, when Terry was 13 years old, being differently gendered was perceived as synonymous with homosexuality by Terry’s peers. In addition to enduring the onslaught of epithets, Terry was the victim of frequent physical harassment including punching, pushing, and kicking. Terry’s sense of isolation reached a peak during these years as she Searched for role models of other differently gendered individuals. She felt ostracized from her peers as well as her own family as a result of her efforts to adjust to life on the gender margins. Throughout junior high school, she felt suicidal and battled with an ongoing sense of depression, isolation, and fear of physical harm. Although Terry’s family recognized her gender-atypical behaviors from an early age, they struggled both to sympathize with and to protect Terry by encouraging her to conform. For example, Terry was prodded to try out for Little League during second grade Terry was not interested in Little League but felt compelled to comply With their wishes in order to fulfill the “correct” role of a boy.

Due to a change in schools, Terry’s high school experience was more positive, but her sense of desolation and detachment continued to escalate. Terry would frequently scour the campus library desperately searching for nuggets of information regarding “transvestism” and “sex changes.” The long, rich history and culture of the transgender community was not readily available to Terry, and this added to her sense of alienation. A critical element in Terry’s survival was a very positive, therapeutic relationship that enabled her to negotiate gender identity in the face of a hostile environment. Terry’s first therapeutic experience lasted throughout her 4 years in high school. After 2 years in therapy, Terry came to identify herself as a transsexual and actively desired sex reassignment surgery. Because of the overwhelming pressure to conform, Terry was not yet aware of the full spectrum of options available to her along the gender continuum. At that time, Terry believed the only way for her to survive in society was to surgically and irrevocably alter her body.

Once Terry started her undergraduate career, she began to discover more resources regarding a specifically transgender identity. Terry discovered that the specificities of transgender experience allow for a more fluid expression of gender and an opportunity to blur the lines of the traditional gender paradigm. Terry started voraciously reading the literature from the burgeoning transgender liberation movement. She became increasingly comfortable with defining herself as a “gender outlaw,” an individual whose gender expression defies easy categorization within American society’s bipolar system. In 1993, during Terry’s freshman year, Terry started to be referred to as “she.” (Ironically, Terry, like many transgender persons, does not support the use of traditional gender designations. The fact that alternative designations such as “hir,” “s/he,” “ze” and “sie” are not common knowledge or popularly used illustrates the extent to which the gender binary is so embedded in our culture and the way that language can function as a barrier to transgender expression, empowerment, and liberation.) Although she made the decision not to surgically or hormonally alter her own body she resolved to fully support others who choose hormonal therapy and surgical reassignment. Terry has decided that perhaps in the future, she may even take advantage of these options. This is further evidence of the fluidity of gender to Terry and her desire not to be categorized in an essentialist way.

When Terry, now a graduate student, presented for counseling with the second author, she identified the following treatment goals: (a) to become more comfortable with her transgender identity in her new midwestern surroundings, (b) to learn techniques to manage symptoms of depression, and (c) to increase social interaction. At first glance, these goals seemed reasonable and attainable. These same goals were frequently identified by graduate students who have relocated, are not yet familiar with the area, and have no social network. Terry was, however, diagnosed with major depressive disorder soon after beginning therapy. The severity of symptoms seemed to fluctuate with Terry’s feelings of isolation. There were times when it was physically and psychologically exhausting for Terry to perform even the most routine tasks. During these times, Terry experienced frequent suicidal ideation. Terry coped with these thoughts and feelings by creating a safety plan in therapy and by talking with supportive friends and allies. Although Terry continues to struggle with symptoms of depression, she has found the coping mechanisms learned in therapy to be useful in managing her suicidality.

The cognitive behavioral techniques that might otherwise have been used to treat her depressive symptoms and facilitate goal achievement were not sufficient with Terry Terry’s cognitions were not distorted; she was not assuming others were staring, they were; she was not worried needlessly about being verbally assaulted, she had been assaulted; she was not imagining “transphobic” reactions from peers and faculty-there was concrete evidence of such reactions. Who would not be depressed under such horrendous circumstances? Depression management techniques were and are effective to a point, as are pharmacological interventions. But despite such efforts, Terry’s reality would remain the same. The society in which she lives is often an oppressive, threatening, and unsafe place for a transgender person.

Outside of counseling, Terry struggled in her social interactions and in making close friendships. At the age of 26, Terry often felt like she was revisiting the “ghosts” of junior high school because petty insults and abusive epithets continued to be a common experience for her. In general, transgender individuals are constantly bombarded with the messages that they are “freaks” who do not belong. Terry often described herself as a “voiceless body” because the physical nature of her gender expression was brazenly apparent on campus. Terry’s height and “masculine” physical features seemed to conflict, in their eyes, with her “feminine” dress, speaking, and comportment. Terry was often recognized or “read” as a biological male who did not meet the rigid gender role requirements of her transphobic surroundings. The campus, located in a rural midwestern community; is overwhelmingly White and conservative. The conventional attire of many of the students, as well as their conformity to rigid gender role standards, left Terry feeling perpetually on the margins. The irony of the situation was that Terry was visible, but only in a negative manner. The physicality of her transgender expression was noticeable and provoked hostile conduct followed by behavior aimed at minimizing Terry’s existence. Terry experienced harassment in a variety of places on campus, including the student union and the library. Because of the level of ostracism she faced, she often internalized the negative comments aimed at her. This affected her ability to trust and to take risks to initiate and establish relationships.

Throughout the counseling process, Terry was encouraged to seek out a community of accepting individuals. At her counselor’s urging, Terry sought out progressive campus groups, such as the Gender Equality Association, whose focus was to advocate for gender equity on campus. Although the original mission of the association was focused on gender equity, Terry worked with the group to expand the definition of “gender equality” to include transgender and gender-variant constituencies. Thus, gender equality took on a more sophisticated valence and fostered a transpositive atmosphere for all members. Terry began to initiate other social contacts for her own personal and political development With some prompting, she became involved in various campuswide projects, including the development of a women’s center for the university. Terry was also encouraged to make contact with individuals whom she perceived to be supportive, like those professors and staff members who displayed pink triangles (e.g., one of the more popular and widely recognized symbols of the gay community, with historical roots in Hitler’s concentration camps) and pink “safe space” ally signs on their office doors and windows. Through these contacts, Terry was able to access trans-affirmative individuals and groups outside the campus community.

Although Terry was able to develop some mutual, healthy relationships as a result of reaching out, her efforts were also met with rejection and hostility. In counseling, Terry’s feelings of rejection and hurt after these experiences were validated. She was assured that it was quite possible that her identity as a transgender person might at least be partially to blame for being socially rejected. She worked very hard at not allowing others’ phobic reactions to define her worth and to develop strategies for optimizing her social success. Even if Terry was rejected, she was able to perceive “reaching out” as progress and an investment in her future. Terry’s willingness to take risks was facilitated by consistent, positive validation in therapy. For her, the counseling center constituted a safe zone, a place to which she could return and where she would feel the support and encouragement to persevere. Safe zones for transgender individuals are defined as places where gender diversity’ is not only accepted but celebrated. The whole rainbow of gender expression is affirmed and welcomed.

Despite positive gains, Terry still experiences depression, isolation, and frequent harassment. She earned her degree despite the “transphobia” and because of the “transpositive” persons she encountered there. Terry believes there is a curious fascination with transgender bodies in our culture, but there is a dearth of genuine interest in the personal and political realities of gender oppressed people. Often she feels like a “deviant” body perpetually on display, a body that effectively has no voice. This sense of feeling stripped of subjectivity, of being turned into an object, makes Terry feel powerless. Therefore, venues for educating the campus community are vitally important to Terry because they enable her to recover the passionate voice that is so often stolen. Terry continues to be an advocate for gay/lesbian/bisexual/transgender and feminist causes and issues. In addition to producing a video on gender diversity, she has conducted countless workshops and delivered many presentations to university and community organizations. This work has helped to heal the scars of her childhood because she feels like she is ushering in a new era of gender freedom. In addition to recognizing the value of speaking up for her empowerment, Terry is a strong believer in the personal benefits of a therapeutic relationship.

On the basis of our clinical experiences, we find that the essential elements of therapy with Terry as with many other transgender persons include listening, empathy, the assumption of an “informed not knowing” stance, and the provision of a safe zone. As is consistent with a constructivistic approach to counseling, listening is critical because it allows clients to tell their story and to be heard. The story is not told only once; the story continues each day with new social context, but key themes of pain and isolation echo throughout Terry’s narratives. Repeated validation of feelings is paramount to the therapy process because of the rigidity of the gender system in society and the subsequent oppression this creates.

CONCLUSION

As supervisors and counselors, we believe that an understanding of transgender clients’ life histories is pivotal to comprehending the complexity of issues brought to therapy. Our experiences working with transgender clients have been unlike any other in our professional careers. Our respective knowledge bases regarding transgender issues have naturally expanded and our abilities as clinicians have improved. After overcoming our initial ignorance and misinformation, we are now comfortably familiar with relevant resources for both client and counselor. These improvements, however, are fairly standard after exposure to a new presenting problem or clinical population. Most significant to us has been the tremendous personal growth we have achieved through our relationships With transgender clients. Because of our research and clinical experiences with this population, we take more time to really listen to all of our client’s stories. We have learned to no longer take for granted the fact that we can walk across our respective campuses, take in a movie, or shop for groceries without verbal abuse or harassment. We no longer take for granted the feeling that we belong-whether to our families, our places of employment, our social circles, or society as a whole. The extent of “gender privilege” is both alarming and ubiquitous. Our consciousness of transphobia has been raised since learning of the intensity and frequency of harassment directed against differently gendered individuals. Although the sexual orientation of many gay, lesbian, bisexual people may not be immediately apparent to others, many transgender persons do not or cannot “pass” (conceal the fact that they are differently gendered) and, therefore, are the most frequently targeted group for social persecution. We do not think any of us in the majority who fit into the normative gender categories of male and female can imagine the paradoxical situation of being very obvious and yet invisible at the same time. Perhaps, most of all, our experiences with the transgender have taught us, as Laird (1999) suggested, to realize our serious professional obligation to take the stories of our transgender clients into the professional literature and into the streets to enable a more humane and just world for all gender identities.

Author Note. The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution of the late Terrianne Summers for her feedback on an earlier draft of this article. Terrianne was a transgender activist and educator who was murdered on December 12, 2001 in front of her home in Jacksonville, Florida. Initial police reports indicated that her shooting was the result of a robbery attempt, although nothing was taken during the incident. This article is dedicated to the memory of Terriane Summers and her tireless efforts to advocate for transgender fights and educate others about transgender issues.

REFERENCES

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Berliner, A. (Director). (1997). Ma vie en rose [Motion picture]. France: Sony Classics.

Bockting, W. O. (1997). Transgender coming out: Implications for the clinical management of gender dysphoria. In B. Bullough, V. L. Bullough, & J. Elias (Eds.), Gender blending (pp. 48-52). Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

Bockting, W. O., Robinson, B. E.; Rosser, B. R. S. (1998). Transgender HIV prevention: Qualitative evaluation of a model prevention education program. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 23, 125-133.

Bolin, A. (1988). In search of Eve: Transsexual rites of passage. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.

Bornstein, K. (1994). Gender outlaw: On men, women and the rest of us. New York: Random House.

Bornstein, K. (1998). My gender workbook. New York: Routledge.

Bullough, B., Bullough, V. L., & Elias, J. (Eds.). (1997). Gender blending. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.

Cole, S. S., Denny, D., Eyler, A. E., & Samons, S. L. (2000). Issues of transgender. In T. Szuchman & E Muscarella ([ids.), Psychological perspectives in human sexuality (pp. 149-195). New York: Wiley.

Denny, D. (1992). The politics of diagnosis and a diagnosis of politics. Chrysalis Quarterly, 1, 9-20.

Denny, D. (1997). Transgender: Some historical, cross-cultural, and contemporary methods and methods of coping and treatment. In B. Bullough, V. L. Bullough, & J. Elias (Eds.), Gender blending (pp. 33-47). Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

Denny, D., & Green, J. 0996). Gender identity and bisexuality. In B. Firestein (Ed.), Bisexuality: The psychology and politics of an invisible minority (pp. 84-102). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Eastwood, C. (Director). (1997). Midnight in the garden of good and evil [Motion picture]. United States: Warner Brothers.

Ettner, R. (1996). Confessions of a gender defender: A psychologist’s reflections on life among the transgender. Evanston, IL: Chicago Spectrum Press.

Ettner, R. (1999). Gender loving care: A guide to counseling gender-variant clients. New York: Norton.

Eyler, A. E., & Wright, K. (1997, July-September). Gender identification and sexual orientation among genetic females with gender-blended self-perception in childhood and adolescence [Electronic version]. The International Journal of Transgenderism, 1(1). Retrieved May 20, 2001, from http://www.symposium.com/ijtc0101.htm

Fagan, P. J., Schmidt, C. W., & Wise, T. N. (1994, August 22, 29) Born to the wrong sex [Letter to the editor]. The New Yorker, pp. 7, 15.

Feinberg, L. (1993). Stone butch blues. A novel. New York: Firebrand.

Feinberg, L. (1996). Transgender warriors: Making history from Joan of Arc to RuPaut. Boston: Beacon Press.

Feinberg, L. (1998). Trans liberation: Beyond pink or blue. Boston: Beacon Press.

Foucault, M. (1980). The history of sexuality: Vol. 1. An Introduction. New York: Vintage.

Fox, R. (1996). Bisexuality in perspective. In B. Firestein (Ed.), Bisexuality: The psychology and politics of an invisible minority (pp. 3-50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Gagne, P., & Tewksbury, R. (1998). Conformity pressures and gender resistance among transgender individuals. Social Problems, 45, 81- 101.

Gagne, P., Tewksbury, R., & McGaughey, D. (1997). Coming out and crossing over: Identity formation and proclamation in a transgender community. Gender & Society, 11, 478-508.

Halberstam, J. (1998). Transgender butch: Butch/FTM border wars and the masculine continuum. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 4, 287-310.

Hill, D. B. (1997). Understanding; knowing, and telling transgender identities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Windsor, Ontario, Canada.

Laird, J. (1999). Gender and sexuality in lesbian relationships: Feminist and constructionist perspectives. In J. Laird (Ed.), Lesbians and lesbian families: Reflections on theory and practice (pp. 47-89). New York: Columbia University Press.

Layton, L. (1998). Who’s that girl? Who’s that boy? Clinical practice meets postmodern gender theory. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.

Lebow, A. (Director). (1994). Outlaw [Motion picture]. [Available from Women Make Movies, 462 Broadway, Suite 500WS, New York, NY 10013)

Livingston, J. (Director). (1991). Paris is burning [Motion picture]. United States: Academy Entertainment.

Lombardi, E. L. (1999). Integration within a transgender social network and its effect upon members’ social and political activity. Journal of Homosexualit35 37, 109-124.

Lorber, J. (1998). Embattled terrain: Gender and sexuality: In M. M. Ferree, J. Lorber, & B. B. Hess (Eds.), Revisioning gender (pp. 416-448). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Mason-Schrock, D. (1996). Transsexuals’ narrative construction of the “true self.” Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 176-192.

Meyer, J. K., & Reter, D. (1979). Sex reassignment: Follow-up. Archives of General Psychiatry, 36(9), 1010-1015.

Meyer, W., Bockting, W., Cohen-Kettenis, R, Coleman, E., Diceglie, D., Devor, H., et al. (2001, January-March). Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Associations’ the standards of care for gender identity disorders (6th version). International Journal of Transgenderism [Online], 5, 1. Available: http://www.syrnposion.com/ijt/soc%5f2001/index.htm

Miller, N. (1996). Counseling in genderland: A guide for you and your transgender client. Boston: Different Path Press.

Muska, S., & Olafsdottir, G. (Directors). (1998). The Brandon Teena story [Motion picture]. United States: Zeitgeist Films.

Parlee, M. B. (1998). Situated knowledge of personal embodiment: Transgender activists’ and psychological theorists’ perspectives on “sex” and “gender.” In H.J. Stam (Ed.), The body and psychology (pp. 120-140). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Peirce, K. (Director). (1999). Boys don’t cry [Motion picture]. United States: Fox Searchlight Pictures.

Perez, R. M., DeBord, K. A., & Bieschke, K. J. (2000). Handbook of counseling and psychotherapy with lesbian, gay, and bisexual clients. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Prosser, J. (1997). Transgender. In A. Medhurst & S. R. Munt (Eds.), Lesbian and gay studies. A critical introduction (pp. 309-326). Hemdon, VA: Cassell.

Queen, C. (1996). Bisexuality, sexual diversity, and the sex-positive perspective In B. A. Firestein (Ed.), Bisexuality: The psychology and politics of an invisible minority (pp. 103-126). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Shapiro, V. (1996). Subjugated knowledge and the working alliance: The narratives of Russian Jewish immigrants, In Session: Psychotherapy in Practice, 1, 9-22.

Stone, S. (1991). The empire strikes back: A postranssexual manifesto. In J. Epstein & K. Straus (Eds.), Body guards: The cultural politics of gender ambiguity (pp. 280-304). New York: Routledge. Sue, D. W., Arredondo, P., & McDavis, R. J. (1992). Multicultural counseling competencies and standards: A call to the profession. Journal of Counseling & Development, 70, 484-486.

Sue, D. W., Bemier, J. G., Durran, M., Feinberg, L., Pedersen P., Smith, E., & Vasques-Nuttall, E. (1982). Position paper: Cross-cultural counseling competencies. The Counseling Psychologist, 10, 45-52.

Sue, D. W., & Sue, D. (1999). Counseling the culturally different: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.

Whittle, S. (1998). The trans-cyberian mail way. Social & Legal Studies, 7, 389-408.

APPENDIX

Glossary of Terms

Please note that the following terms and their definitions are not necessarily universally accepted. Variations exist both within and outside trans communities in the usage and interpretation of these terms.

Cross-dresser: An individual who dresses in clothing that is culturally associated with members of the “other” sex. Most cross-dressers are heterosexual and conduct their cross-dressing on a part-time basis. Cross-dressers cross-dress for a variety of reasons, including pleasure, a relief from stress, and a desire to express “opposite” sex feelings to the larger society.

Drag King: A term usually reserved for individuals who identify themselves as lesbians and who cross-dress for entertainment purposes in lesbian and gay bars.

Drag Queen: A term usually reserved for individuals who identify themselves as gay men and who cross-dress for entertainment purposes in lesbian and gay bars.

Gender: A complicated set of sociocultural practices whereby human bodies are transformed into “men” and “women.” Gertder refers to that which a society deems “masculine” or “feminine.” Gender identity refers to an individual’s self-identification as a man, woman, transgender, or other identity category.

Gender bender: An individual who brazenly and flamboyantly flaunts society’s gender conventions by mixing elements of “masculinity” and “femininity.” The gender bender is often an enigma to the uninitiated viewer, who struggles to comprehend sartorial codes that challenge gender bipolarity. Boy George, a popular culture icon, was often referred to as a “gender bender” by the press.

Gender dysphoria: A term used by the psychiatric establishment to refer to a radical incongruence between an individual’s birth sex and their gender identity. An individual who is “gender dysphoric” feels an irrevocable disconnect between their physical bodies and their mental sense of gender. Many in the transgender community find this term offensive or insulting because it often pathologizes the transgender individuals due to its association with the DSM-IV.

Gender identity: see Gender.

Gender outlaw: A term popularized by trans activists such as Kate Bornstein and Leslie Feinberg, a gender outlaw refers to an individual who transgresses or violates the “law” of gender (i.e., one who challenges the rigidly enforced gender roles) in a transphobic, heterosexist, and patriarchal society.

Gender queer: A term that refers to individuals who “queer” the notions of gender in a given society. Gender queer may also refer to people who identify as both transgender and queer (i.e., individuals who challenge both gender and sexuality regimes and see gender identity and sexual orientation as overlapping and interconnected).

Gender trash: A term that calls attention to the way that differently gendered individuals are often treated like “trash” in a transphobic culture.

Gender variant: A term that refers to individuals who stray from socially accepted gender roles in a given culture. This word may be used in tandem with other group labels, such as gender-variant gay men and lesbians.

Intersex: Formally termed hermaphrodites, individuals termed intersex are born with some combination of ambiguous genitalia. The Intersex movement seeks to halt pediatric surgery and hormone treatments that attempt to normalize infants into the dominant “male” and “female” roles.

Queer: Queer is a term that has been reclaimed by members of the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender communities to refer to people who transgress culturally imposed norms of heterosexuality and gender traditionalism. Although still often an abusive epithet when used by heterosexuals, many queer-identified people have taken back the word to use it as a symbol of pride and affirmation of difference and diversity.

Queer theorist: An individual, usually an academic, who uses feminism, psychoanalysis, poststructuralism and other theoretical schools to critically analyze the position of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender individuals in cultural texts.

Sex: Separate from gender, this term refers to the duster of logical, chromosomal, and anatomical features associated with maleness and femaleness in the human body. Sexual dimorphism is often thought to be a concrete reality, whereas in reality the existence of the intersex points to a multiplicity of sexes in the human population.

Sexuality: An imprecise word that is often used in tandem with other social categories, as in race, gender, and sexuality. Sexuality is a broad term that refers to a cluster of behaviors, practices, and identities in the social world.

Sexual orientation: This term refers to the gender(s) that a person is emotionally, physically, romantically, and erotically attracted to. Examples of sexual orientation include homosexual, bisexual, heterosexual, and asexual. transgender and gender-variant people may identify with any sexual orientation, and their sexual orientation may or may not change during or after gender transition.

Trans: An umbrella term that refers to cross-dressers, transgenderists, transsexuals and others who permanently or periodically dis-identify with the sex they were assigned at birth. Trans is preferable to “transgender” to some in the community because it does not minimize the experiential specificities of transsexuals.

Transgender: A range of behaviors, expressions, and identifications that challenge the pervasive bipolar gender system in a given culture. This, like trans, is an umbrella term that includes a vast array of differing identity categories such as transsexual, drag queen, drag king, cross-dresser, transgenderist, bi-gendered, and a myriad of other identities.

transgender lesbian: An individual, regardless of biological sex, who identifies as both transgender and lesbian. This could include male-to-female transgenders who are sexually attracted to women, or to biological females who identify as lesbians and who often “pass” as men or who identify to some degree with masculinity or with “butch.”

Transgenderist: Coined by Virginia Prince, this category refers to an individual who dis-identifies with their assigned birth sex and lives full time in congruence with their gender identity. This may include a regime of hormone therapy, but usually transgenderists do not seek or want sex reassignment surgery.

Transphobia: The irrational fear and hatred of all those individuals who transgress, violate, or blur the dominant gender categories in a given society. Transphobic attitudes lead to massive discrimination and oppression against the trans, drag, and intersex communities.

Transsexual: An individual who strongly dis-identifies with their birth sex and wishes to use hormones and sex reassignment surgery (or gender confirmation surgery) as a way to align their physical body with their internal gender identity.

Transvestite: An older term, synonymous with the more politically correct term cross-dresser, that refers to individuals who have an internal drive to wear clothing associated with a gender other than the one that they were assigned at birth. The term transvestite has fallen out of favor due to its psychiatric, clinical, and fetishistic connotations.

~~~~~~~~

By Lynne Carroll; Paula J. Gilroy and Jo Ryan

Lynne Carroll is an associate professor and codirector of the Counselor Education Program at the University of North Florida, Jacksonville.

Correspondence regarding this article should be sent to Lynne Carroll, Counselor Education Program, Schultz Hall, University of North Florida, 4567 St. Johns Bluff Road, South, Jacksonville, FL 32224-2676 (e-mail: lcarrollATunf.edu).

Paula J. Gilroy is a psychologist at the University of Northern Iowa Counseling Center, Cedar Falls.

Jo Ryan is a graduate student at the University of New Hampshire, Durham.

Copyright of Journal of Counseling & Development is the property of American Counseling Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder’s express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.

Source: Journal of Counseling & Development, Spring2002, Vol. 80 Issue 2, p131, 9p

Republished at transgendermap.com with kind permission of the authors and publisher.

Margaret Ann McGhee (born 1942) is an American technology executive. Shewas a prolific contributor on the support group dedicated to “autogynephilia” in early 2004, before group founder Willow Arune inadvertently got the group banned from Yahoo in 2005 for trolling and defamation.

Background

Her 2009 autobiography states:

My adolescence, growing up in Texas in the fifties, was a nightmare of guilt, self-hate, confused emotions and sexuality – and, oh yeah, don’t forget the abusive step-mother. At fifteen I left home and headed to California where my grandparents graciously supported me while I completed high school. After graduating I moved out on my own and started working my way through college. Over the years and despite the confusion I gradually developed a male persona that gave me sufficient happiness. Perhaps to kill off that inner female once and for all, I married a smart and attractive wife who soon gave us a wonderful son. This marriage only lasted a few years however as my inner female was becoming restless. After our separation the “do your own thing” sexually permissive spirit of California in the sixties became my great escape. Those were heady times when I grew my hair long, resisted the war, smoked lots of dope and wore bell-bottoms and flowing shirts. My inner female was wishing for flowing skirts as well but I kept her repressed enough that my male existence was still the only face I presented to the world.

Over the next several years I started migrating northward. With stops in Santa Cruz and Eugene, the farther north I went the more I liked it. I eventually established a good life in Bellingham in the wet, cool and intensely green northwest corner of Washington state. I met and married a wonderful woman there. After a few years we moved to Idaho and together raised my son from my earlier marriage. Life was good. Except for the occasional stealth cross-dressing episode my inner female was safely tucked away from everyone. Then one day in 1997, after 22 years of marriage, my wife was killed by a drunk driver. In the weeks and months that followed, the woman inside me firmly reclaimed her place in my life. It was an overwhelming force that I could not resist. It just felt right. I became convinced that my destiny was to become as close to a biological female as possible through sexual reassignment surgery. I started down that path including the necessary psychological counseling and a year of HRT (hormone replacement therapy). However, as time went by I realized that I was not ready to completely abandon my male side which I had nurtured so carefully all those years and had become an important part of who I was. Also, I was reluctant to surgically alter my body unless I was absolutely sure that my happiness required it. I couldn’t confidently come to that conclusion and so I stepped off that train.

At the time I wasn’t sure how all this would work out but by following my feelings as honestly as I could and not analyzing things too much I seem to have found a happy middle ground for now, where I spend as much time as I wish in either persona. That’s not to say that my life is all happiness and bliss these days juggling dual external identities but it is far better than hiding my true feelings from those close to me. The few problems I face these days are practical ones, not ethical. I do try to stay focused on my many other interests in life and living each day to its fullest which is always a wise plan anyway. Aside from exploring human nature, some of these interests include playing the guitar and making music with friends, fly fishing, cooking and outdoor photography. A large part of my happiness these days is no doubt due to my marriage, going on three years now, to a wonderful and intelligent woman who appreciates both of us as much as we do her. And also, to the many new friends I have found since moving back to Washington.

http://geocities.com/margimcghee/ (2009)

Margaret has an interest in evolutionary psychology, a field which heavily underpins The Man Who Would Be Queen by J. Michael Bailey. Bailey and Anne Lawrence are the primary proponents of the “autogynephilia” diagnosis created by Ray Blanchard.

Margaret has written an summary of the controversy available on her site:

Autogynephilia, a Narrative

http://www.geocities.com/margimcghee/Articles/AG.htm

also in PDF

http:// www.fusionair.com/margismugs/ag.pdf

2005 message

Margaret sent the following on 7 October 2005:

This evening I was browsing tsroadmap and was surprised to find a page there dedicated to some information about me. This was regarding some posts that I made in the past to the now long defunct autogynephila forum.

http://www.tsroadmap.com/info/margaret-mcghee.html

I seem to be described as being a supporter of Blanchard’s theory of autogynephilia.

I did spend a lot of time at the ag forum as you say. I did try to be as friendly as possible with the other members of the ag forum. However, my presence there was to politely argue against the concept.

While there I presented counter-arguments. I confronted both Anne Lawrence and Michael Bailey with those arguments. Much of the substance of my counter-arguments were taken from information that I found following links from your website.

Willow Arune referred to me as one of the non-believers – who was allowed to stay (probably because I did not personally attack anyone there even though I was frequently attacked myself). I was accused more than once by other members of being in cahoots with you, Susan James and Lynn Conway – or perhaps being a spy for you  Finally, they got fed up with me and I was kicked off. 

While there, I think I learned a bit and gained some understanding of the psychology of the transsexuals who supported the theory. That’s one reason I hung out there. I couldn’t understand how anyone could go through life feeling that badly about themself – and I wanted to understand it better.

In any case, I am definitely not a supporter of Blanchard’s theory. Nor do I believe that transsexuality or gender variance is in any sense a pathology. In the interest of accuracy, and because I would not want anyone to get the wrong impression it would be helpful if you corrected your listing.

Feel free to check me out further or ask me any questions you like. I wouldn’t expect you to change anything you’ve written unless you were certain that it was correct.

I do have an interest in evolutionary psychology. That may be why you assumed I supported Bailey. I’d say my understanding of the intersection of evolution and transsexuality is more along the lines of what Joan Roughgarden writes in Evolution’s Rainbow.

Yes, I believe human transsexuality is the result of evolution, as is every single aspect of human nature. I believe it is a perfectly natural outcome – to be celebrated, not pathologized.

I have not been active in any ts online groups for some time now. My interests have lately been in more general aspects of identity. I am working on an hypothesis that relates worldview to group conflict, alliance and other social phenomema. One reason I find this interesting is the firsthand experience I gained about the autogynephilia conflict from having in-depth discussions with members of the ag forum.

Thanks in advance for your attention to this matter,
Margaret McGhee

My response:

Hi Margaret–

Thanks for writing. When all this was going down, I found the best thing to do was to document everyone who got involved and sort it out later. This led to a pretty quick vectoring of the institutions from which all this BBL stuff was emanating, and how Bailey operates (science by press conference). Ultimately, Lawrence and Bailey are both self-hating [trans] chasers with different strategies for getting closer to the objects of their desire. This brings profound bias to the knowledge they produce and their writings about that knowledge.

I knew Arune would eventually be seen as a crank, based on Arune’s long trolling history on Usenet. Arune is simply replaying some old injury again and again in an attempt to control it.  Lisanne Anderson aka Lori Anjou eventually was seen that way, too, as well as Deni aka Suki aka Alejandra aka Steffie and all the other old school web trolls inhabiting that group. As I note here below the chart:

http://www.tsroadmap.com/info/autogynephilia-support.html

“Please note that several of the people listed above have expressed concern about the term, and do not necessarily agree it is a legitimate diagnosis.” 

That was meant to include you.

I also note that you stopped posting after an initial burst of activity, another common pattern as people began to see that it was a troll site. By the time Arune’s incompetence led to that group’s demise, it was basically a carbon copy of Arune’s Usenet “contributions” before and since: cut-and-paste jobs from other publications, plus slander and baiting of people Arune doesn’t like.

So, now we have a record of a bizarre attempt to create a community around an identity based on a sex-fueled mental illness. Several of the people involved had a similar learning trajectory as I did: my first impression was that “autogynephilia” was a love of self as a woman. I even sent Anne Lawrence a note around the time Lawrence published an introduction to the concept saying that it made sense. As with many others, I did not grasp that this was a paraphilic model which casts our motivations as a sex-fueled mental illness. One of my majors was classical Greek, so I assumed “philia” (friendly love, affection, friendship) could be considered in apposition to “phobia” (panic fear/hatred) and suggested to Dr. Lawrence that my own motivation might be better described as “autoandrophobia,” a hatred of my self as male. It was only when the Bailey book came out that I understood how “philia” was used by these guys.

If you don’t mind, I’d like to include your letter and this response on that page, as well as anything else you’d like to include. I knew a lot of the debate would be ephemeral, which is why I had a “document now, sort out later” philosophy. I wanted a historical record of the contemporaneous response. I still consider this event a turning point in trans history, the beginning of the end for the gatekeeping “authorities” who would medicalize and pathologize us the way they used to with gays and lesbians. Unfortunately, they have some key people in the President’s Council on Bioethics and involved in the DSM-V revision committees, so we are not out of the woods, yet. This will prove to be a decisive turning point in our fight for rights. BBL have done more to mobilize an international coalition of trans activists that anything since the invention of the internet itself.

Thanks again for contacting me! I look forward to hearing back from you.

In February 2006, I got the following note:

Hi Andrea, I mentioned several weeks ago that I would attempt to write an essay describing my experience as a dissenting member of the Yahoo AG-support group and what I thought about it all now. It’s been a major project but I seem to be running out of reasons to revise it further. So, if you want to post a link you are welcome to do that. It’s at:
  
http://www.geocities.com/margimcghee/Articles/AG.htm
 
I’d also be interested in your opinion.

Resources

LINK: Margaret McGhee’s personal site

http://www.geocities.com/margimcghee/indexmm.htm

LINK: Margaret’s theory about two “types” of transsexuals

http://www.geocities.com/margimcghee/Articles/tstheory.htm

LINK: Autogynephilia Redux: A Memoir – The Trans-woman Who Is Me

http://www.geocities.com/margimcghee/Articles/AG.htm

Dallas Denny (born August 18, 1949) is an American author, counselor, and transgender rights activist known for publishing and archiving community resources. Denny is one of the most important transgender figures of the 1990s.

Background

Denny was born on August 18, 1949 in Asheville, North Carolina. Denny earned a bachelor’s degree in psychology from Middle Tennessee State University in 1974 and a master’s degree from University of Tennessee-Knoxville in 1977. Denny also did postgraduate work at East Tennessee State University, Georgia State University, and Vanderbilt University.

Denny worked for the State of Tennessee from 1979 to 1990 as a caseworker and analyst. From 1990 to 2008 Denny worked as a behavior analyst for the DeKalb Community Service Board.

Transgender activism

In 1990 Denny founded AEGIS (American Educational Gender Information Service), later renamed Gender Education & Advocacy. Denny also founded the print journal Chrysalis Quarterly. In 1993 Denny founded the National Transgender Library & Archive.

In the 1990s Denny continued the work of the Erickson Educational Foundation, helped found Atlanta’s transgender Southern Comfort Conference, and directed Fantasia Fair. From 1999 to 2008 Denny was editor of Transgender Tapestry, published by the International Foundation for Gender Education.

Books include:

  • Gender Dysphoria: A Guide to Research (1994)
  • Current Concepts in Transgender Identity (1998)

Honors include:

  • IFGE’s Trinity Virginia Prince Lifetime Achievement Award
  • Real Life Experience’s Transgender Pioneer Award

Letter to National Academies (2003)

Denny sent the following letter to the National Academies regarding J. Michael Bailey’s transphobic book The Man Who Would Be Queen. Denny got the same form letter from Suzanne Woolsey as everyone else.

25 June, 2003

Bruce Alberts, President, the National Academy of Sciences
Harvey V. Fineberg, President, the Institute of Medicine

The National Academies
2101 Constitution Avenue NW
Washington DC 20418

Dear Dr. Alberts and Dr. Fineberg:

I am writing in regard to a recent publication under the National Academies of Sciences imprimatur, namely Michael Bailey’s The Man Who Would be Queen. As you know, Bailey’s book is deliberately provocative and is considered highly offensive by many who have read it. I count myself in this growing number.

Also as you know, Bailey is claiming he is advancing a science-based argument in his deliberately objectional depictions of gay men and transsexuals. However, there is no science in his book, merely sweeping generalizations and grand statements which are not backed up by data or even citations for publications which might contain such data.

Controversial books often serve to advance science, but only when they use carefully considered arguments and present data to convince the reasoned reader of the validity of the author’s arguments. Darwin did this. Thomas Kuhn did this. Even popular works such as the late Stephen Jay Gould’s The Mismeasure of Man discuss actual research and interpret the findings. The Jerry Springer approach used by Bailey informs no one; it serves merely to further polarize an already-polarized issue.

My question to you is: why has the esteemed National Academies of Sciences lent its credibility and dignity to such a discreditable and undignified work as The Man Who Would Be Queen? In this age of reality TV and junk journalism, are you deliberately tarnishing your heretofore respected image– or was someone asleep at the wheel?

Thank you.
Dallas Denny, M.A., Licensed Psychological Examiner (Ret.)

Resources

Dallas Denny (dallasdenny.com)

Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)

The American Psychology Association (APA) is a psychology trade group.

Note: for the trade group of psychiatrists that uses the same acronym, see American Psychiatric Association.

Background

The APA was founded in 1892. Nineteen divisions were approved in 1944, and by 2007 there were 54 divsions.

APA Division 44, which is the APA’s division for psychologists who are sex and gender minorities or who specialize in the topic, was a stronghold of anti-trans psychologists for many years.

In 2024 they had approximately157,000 members,

2008 Task Force

In 2008 APA published a controversial report prepared Task Force consisting of several people heavily involved in promoting disease models of trans and gender diverse people, including Kenneth J. Zucker and Anne Lawrence.

2024 policy resolution

On February 28, 2024, APA published a policy resolution after it passed 153-9.

References

APA Council of Representatives (February 2024). APA Policy Statement on Affirming Evidence-Based Inclusive Care for Transgender, Gender Diverse, and Nonbinary Individuals, Addressing Misinformation, and the Role of Psychological Practice and Science. https://www.apa.org/about/policy/transgender-nonbinary-inclusive-care (PDF)

Reed, Erin (February 28, 2024). World’s Largest Psych Association Passes Policy Supporting Trans Youth Care By Massive Margin. Erin in the Morning https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/worlds-largest-psych-association

Resources

American Psychological Association (apa.org)

Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)

Facebook (facebook.com)

Twitter (twitter.com)

LinkedIn (linkedin.com)

YouTube (youtube.com)

Instagram (instagram.com)

Nicola R. Brown is a Canadian psychologist who has worked at Toronto’s CAMH gender clinic. Brown has published resources and consumer information for transgender people, as well as published psychological research, including a book chapter with fired sexologist Kenneth Zucker.

Background

Nicola Ruth Brown was born in 1976. She attended York University, earning a master’ss degree in 2001 and a doctorate in 2006. Brown then completed a postdoctoral fellowship at Harvard University in the Victims of Violence Program. Brown has served as staff psychologist in the Gender Identity Clinic for adults at CAMH. Brown also has a private practice.

According to a profile of Brown on the 2018 CAMH website, “Clinical interests include sexual orientation and gender identity concerns. Research interests include clinical decision-making and best practice models for working with trans people, adaptive processes of the significant others of trans people, and the social determinants of health.”

While working at Central Toronto Youth Service, Brown published the first edition of Families in TRANSition in 2008. This guide provides information and resources for families with a gender-diverse or transgender member.

Collaboration with Ken Zucker

Brown and Zucker published the chapter “Gender Dysphoria” in the 2014 book Principles and Practice of Sex Therapy, edited by Yitzchak M. Binik and Kathryn S.K. Hall. The chapter heavily favors Zucker’s point of view on pathologization and cures of trans youth, devoting only one paragraph in the chapter to affirmative care for children. They claim affirmative care that is the consensus among pediatricians is merely the model “that receives the most media attention, and it certainly dominates Internet discourse.” Zucker was fired from CAMH a year after publication.

References

McIntosh C, Brown NR (2023). Psychotherapy with trans and gender diverse people. In H. Crisp & G.O. Gabbard (Eds.), Textbook of Psychotherapeutic Treatments (2nd ed), pp. 667-680. American Psychiatric Association Publishing. ISBN 9781615373260

Brown NR. (2021). Intimate partner violence. In A. Goldberg & G. Beemyn (Eds.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Trans Studies. SAGE Publishing. ISBN 9781544393841

Kallivayalil D, Levitan J, Brown NR, Harvey MR (2013). Preliminary findings from a qualitative study of trauma survivors in treatment: Changes in personal narratives. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 22 (3), 262-281. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2013.743942 

CAMH (2018). CPA Accredited Clinical Psychology Residency Program 2018-2019 Academic Year. http://www.camh.ca/-/media/files/camh-psychology-residency-brochure-20182019-academic-year—october-18-2017-version-pdf.pdf

Zucker KJ, Brown NR (2014). Gender Dysphoria. In Principles and Practice of Sex Therapy, Fifth Edition. Binik YM, Hall KSK, eds. Guilford Publications. ISBN 9781462513895

Brown NR, Kallivayalil D, Mendehlson M, Harvey MR (2011). Working the double edge: Unbraiding pathology and resiliency in the narratives of early-recovery trauma survivors. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024969

Brown NR (2011). Holding tensions of victimization and perpetration: Partner abuse in trans communities. In J. Ristock (Ed.), Intimate Partner Violence in LGBTQ Lives. Routledge. ISBN 9780415998796

Brown NR (2010). The sexual relationships of sexual-minority women partnered with trans men: A qualitative study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 561- 572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-009-9511-9

Brown NR (2009). “I’m in transition too”: Sexual identity renegotiation in sexualminority women’s relationships with transsexual men. International Journal of Sexual Health, 21, 62-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317610902720766

Brown NR, Miller L (2008). Families in TRANSition guide. Second edition (2016): https://ctys.org/wp-content/uploads/Families-in-TRANSition.pdf

Brown NR (2005). Queer Women Partners of Female-to-Male Transsexuals: Renegotiating Self in Relationship. [unpublished doctoral dissertation], York University, UK. https://bac-lac.on.worldcat.org/oclc/191239034

Brown NR (2001). Women’s passionate friendships. Typescript Masters Thesis, York University.

Resources

Dr. Nicola Brown (nicolabrown.ca)

Rainbow Health Ontario (rainbowhealthontario.ca)

CAMH (camh.ca)

Central Toronto Youth Service (ctys.org)

  • Y-GAP health (PDF)